data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8a8d/f8a8db7d83dcd2ce87827af05408618c2f617394" alt="Government bans foreign AI, urges investment in local tech"
Government bans foreign AI, urges investment in local tech
Technology#HRTech#HRCommunity#Artificial Intelligence
The Australian government has imposed a ban on foreign-controlled artificial intelligence (AI) technology DeepSeek R1, intensifying discussions on the necessity of investing in domestic AI capabilities. The move reflects growing concerns over data security and national sovereignty as global AI adoption accelerates.
The ban, targeting the Chinese-developed AI, underscores the government’s apprehensions about potential risks associated with foreign AI tools. Authorities cited "unacceptable risks" on government devices, emphasizing the need to develop secure, locally controlled alternatives. The decision aligns with increasing scrutiny on foreign technology’s role in critical infrastructure and public services.
In response, the Australian Information Industry Association (AIIA) has put forward a recommendation ahead of the federal budget announcement, advocating for significant investments in homegrown AI innovations. Trellis Data, an Australian AI company, has joined the call, warning that without decisive action, Australia risks falling behind in the global AI race.
Michael Gately, CEO of Trellis Data, voiced concerns over the country’s dependence on international AI solutions. “Australia can't afford to always rely on foreign AI that we neither control nor fully trust,” he stated. Gately stressed that sustained investment in Australian AI is crucial to safeguarding data security, ensuring competitiveness, and fostering economic growth. “We believe the Federal Government can lead the way by actually adopting and utilising more home-grown AI solutions,” he added.
A key issue stemming from the reliance on foreign AI is the security risk posed by the absence of reliable domestic alternatives. Without Australian-built AI systems, government employees and businesses may resort to using unregulated tools or personal devices, inadvertently creating vulnerabilities. Trellis Data argues that robust government-led investment in local AI development could mitigate these risks by ensuring that AI technologies are managed in a secure, compliant environment.
“A strong, sovereign AI sector isn't just an economic advantage—it's a national security imperative,” Gately emphasized. He called for a strategic shift towards building, rather than merely consuming, AI technologies. “The time to act is now,” he insisted, urging swift policy measures to strengthen Australia's AI capabilities.
Trellis Data has been actively developing AI applications for high-security sectors, including government, law enforcement, and intelligence. The company’s mission aligns with broader national objectives to position Australia as a leader in AI development, ensuring that data protection and economic growth remain rooted in Australian values.
As the federal government prepares to announce its budget, the decision to ban DeepSeek R1 serves as a catalyst for broader conversations on Australia’s technological future. Industry leaders and policymakers now face the challenge of ensuring that the nation does not just regulate AI but actively contributes to its global development.
The coming months will be crucial in determining whether Australia can transition from being an AI consumer to an AI innovator, securing both economic and national security interests in an increasingly AI-driven world.